Despite the global embarrassment India faced at the recent Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit, Indian media continues to spin tales and push propaganda against Pakistan.
After world leaders refused to name the Pahalgam incident while recognizing Pakistan’s legitimate concerns about Indian-sponsored terrorism, Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh refused to sign the joint statement by SCO member states.
The recent faux pas committed by the Indian envoy at the SCO Summit comes as yet another example of India’s global isolation.
Security experts have remarked that no major country showed any sympathy to India or stood with India after it attacked Pakistan using the Pahalgam incident as an excuse.
Nearly two months after the Pahalgam incident, India’s investigative agencies failed to apprehend the militants responsible for the incident.
Instead of accepting its failure, Indian security forces blamed Pakistan for sending the alleged “terrorists” who conducted the Pahalgam incident.
Indian media has now adopted a new editorial policy by using the phrase “Pakistani terrorists” referencing the Pahalgam incident.
SCO member states condemned terrorist attacks in Pakistan’s Balochistan region despite the objections raised by India.
As India faces a streak of catastrophic diplomatic failures under the Modi government, its media and public remain blinded by hate for the Pakistani people.
Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh tried to frame Operation Sindoor as a preemptive action against alleged terror infrastructure in Pakistan.
His speech, however, offered nothing new, just a repetition of India’s worn-out blame narrative.
What stood out more than the speech itself was the stark lack of support India received.
Not a single SCO member state, neither China, Russia, nor Iran, acknowledged or endorsed the operation. India was left diplomatically isolated.
Which is another slap to Modi’s foreign policy and democracy.
India’s statements once again attempted to portray Pakistan as a sponsor of terrorism, calling for action against states that “use cross-border terrorism as state policy.”
